Hello! I’ve been asked by The Anti Room to contribute a number of pieces over the coming months to offer a different voice and perspective on issues than might otherwise be found here. As a fairly recent convert to Twitter, and social media in general, I’m glad to do it, and, being interested in other perspectives myself, I’m looking forward to some robust debate!
To start I’ve been asked to reflect and respond to the general furore surrounding the accusations of sexism made against Richard Keys and Andy Gray of Sky Sports. Because a furore it has been. Column inches have turned into yards and on into miles. Calling it a storm in the teacup would be an understatement. Storm in a thimble, possibly. First of all let me declare I’m not a football fan. I don’t know the game; indeed I rarely watch it outside of World Cups (on the rare occasion when Ireland make it through!). And I wouldn’t know Ryan Giggs if he jogged past me on the street. But from my perspective, the media reaction over the past few days has been akin to a medieval witch-hunt. Quite clearly (to me anyway) a liberal media consensus has emerged with commentators hell-bent on ramming a feminist agenda down the throats of the public by punishing and humiliating two men who were simply caught off-guard in a moment of professional privacy. What was simply an instance of harmless male banter, the type one hears day-in day-out on building sites, offices and even houses of parliament, has somehow been upgraded to the status of a sexual assault.
Now don’t get me wrong, suggesting that Sian Massey can’t understand the offside rule because she’s a woman is clearly going to be insulting to a girl who tries very hard at her job. But how is the public interest being really served by the sort of affirmative action which results in these women being “promoted” to major roles in what is essentially a male realm? Do feminists want or need traction in every aspect of male society? If we are to believe, for example, that women should run and own clubs and even officiate at the games then why not take that thought process to its logical conclusion? Let’s see if women can play in the darned things! Of course nobody cares to mention this great big elephant in the room – you won’t see “Tina Down The Street” take on John Terry or Robbie Keane because of physiological reasons that go back to the very creation of the universe! Anybody who thinks otherwise is clearly living in Cloud Cuckoo Land – and let you tell me it’s getting very crowded there.
But I digress. Events like football matches have a proven sociological benefit – everyday, male aggression, which might otherwise emerge in more sinister forms like war and rape, can be expelled in the den of a stadium or in the cut-and-thrust of watching your favourite team on TV. This healthy, primordial urge harks right back to hunter-gathers and should not be denied in the name of some feminist liberal ideology. Men have a right to this private, albeit very public, space. I only wish our media would spend more time focusing on the real moral crisis in football culture: young men stuck in pubs all weekend; rampant hooliganism; the sex and pornography permeating TV advertising; not to mention extolling “role-models” like Wayne Rooney and Ashley Cole – two philanderers who clearly don’t understand the real Offside Rule!
Oh, and speaking of which – my husband must have tried explaining the Offside Rule to me ten times over the years and guess what? Nope, cannot get my head around it! And I’m University educated! Something tells me that if you gathered together most regular Anti Room contributors or indeed any random female focus group to watch a game, many of them wouldn’t get it either, and let’s be honest, simply wouldn’t care. Richard Keys mentioned “dark forces” at work in the leaking of the offending clips to the media. In this instance, I must most forcefully agree.
God bless,
Attracta McCarthy-McKenna
Oh, Anti Room, you scamps.
Shameless baiting. Hope ‘Attracta’ brings you outrage and links aplenty.
It is interesting that the poll on VideoHQ though currently comes just about in favour of the sacking by about 2-1:
http://skysports.videohq.tv
All the sexism videos on there don’t look any better though when you watch them back to back.
Goodness
I am surprised. I am an avid football fan and object not only to gender discrimination but a host of other matters: laddism, crudity, mindless talking through the game, baiting of referees, stupid banalities. The list is endless. Oh, and by the way, it took a long time to get racialism out of commentaries. Can you believe it, people thought it harmless fun. Save us, save us from this.
Bahahahaha
Attracta McCarthy-McKenna – you say it like it is lady
I look forward to further insightful articles like this one
I’m just shocked that someone who can’t understand the offside rule after having it explained to her ten times is able to operate a keyboard and mouse.
I’m with Lisa on this one. I do hope this post is a joke as it offended me on so many levels as to be quite scary. Especially the line “insulting to a girl who tries very hard at her job.” Argh, it is a joke post, must be!
I do hope this post was made in jest. I have no interest in football, yet many, many women do. Its sexist behaviour like this that puts women off pursuing sports that can be enjoyable. Sky have, I’m sure, realised that they can open up their marketing to women and by sacking Grey they may believe that they are making a profitable decision in the long term. It is also good for young women players and professionals in the male side. Oh and the “football is a healthy way of avoiding war” idea is tired and untrue, its more about creating men, buts that’s a different argument.
Its grate to here from a reel wuman lik Attracta insted of all manhateing feminsts. Bloks cant just hav a laff anymor.
“Now don’t get me wrong, suggesting that Sian Massey can’t understand the offside rule because she’s a woman is clearly going to be insulting to a girl who tries very hard at her job.”
A girl who tries very hard at her job? Excuse me, did you say a girl? A girl who tries very hard at her job? She is a professionally trained official who obviously excels enough in her field to have made it on to FIFAs list of assistant referees. She has experience at European level as well as in the Premier League. You make it sound like she’s a guileless apprentice or something.
Anti-room it’s very noble this idea of inviting diversity of opinions but why not just give Brenda Power a regular column while you’re at it. Jeez.
So restful and reassuring to read your column. Sometimes I just want to chuck in this struggle, this constant spiral of thinking, but your calm, wise voice reminds me I don’t have to try. I just think I do, because of what I read in the papers and hear on the radio.
God bless you, too, dear Attracta. With your help, the women of Ireland may finally realise what a relief it is to give up. I applaud the bravery and honesty of your post, and I’d love to buy you a brandy and Babycham at the Antiroom Easter dance.
I’m trying to work out if Attracta’s name is an anagram.
Andy Gray was not sacked for harmless banter – it was the appalling sexual harassment leaked on You Tube by the crew who had been subject to his bullying for too long that finally led to his employer taking action. But perhaps you think that a man on £1million per annum asking a young blonde female presenter to tuck his genitals into his trousers is not blatant abuse of power that an employer should take immediate action on?
just one thing..
The media coverage has been shyte, one notable broadcaster
told me that sexual-harassment/sexism in sports is a ‘social
issue’ (hi George Hook).
It is NOT. I fought eight years to get to a courtroom and#
vindicate my case for the mess that was my recruitment
to a non-traditional trade area for Irish women.
I did the job as well as any man and loved every single
minute of it- the fact that management had difficulties
wasn’t my problem.
I am (still) ireland’s only fully qualified woman stone-cutter.
Now , I don’t think its a backlash or any such thing
to want to work in an area that is non-traditional
and would encourage anyone to try new things.
The fact that someone who did so is hounded by
sexism is not given seriousness by media because
there is a fear that what is perceived as a male-only
territory is being impinged upon.
eh, the root and basis of that fear is quite simply
territorialism, which is silly. encouraging strict gender-roles
is a limitation in action and not really about freedom
but control.
To sum up: boys will be boys.
Also: dodgy “biology”.
Furthermore: I’m a woman and I neither like nor care about football and I’m sure plenty of women are like me, so that proves my point, which essentially proves nothing at all?
Okay.
Hi all.
Thanks for all the interesting responses. It’s a bit overwhelming as I’m not used to such instant feedback on my columns.
I’d like to point you in the direction of this interview with Richard Keys wife: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1351075/Richard-Keys-wife-Julia-speaks-Sky-Sports-sexism-scandal.html
An interesting perspective, don’t you think?
God bless,
Attracta (@attractamac on Twitter)
Attracta, doll: would love to know which columns are generating the slow-burning feedback.
Google seems to think you only exist in the anti-room.
xoxo,
Helen.
@Subashini
the fact that this woman trained for a job that she wished to
do has nothing at all to do with ‘your’ lack of care for footie !
The fact that she is trained and doing the job would indicate
that it is for her a passion. now, anyone who denies passionate
interest on the basis of societally conditioned roles is
basically denying a human being the right to develop
their unique individuality. That happens an awful lot to
girls and can be seen in girly-gangs, sisters and friends
who practice the putting-down and isolation of ‘difference’
so beautifully. One such ‘lady’ laughed off sexism on the
radio last week and yet she has absolutely no expertise
in the area, save that she’s a token pair of heels to
discuss issues of import by kow-towing to male opinion.
Irish radio sometimes does that and thereby refuses
to acknowledge the seriousness of sexism by
employing airheads to respond on issues they know
NOWT about.
I’m pretty sure Subashini was being sarcastic. And she’s not the only one…
er… ok
am not not so good at onlineish sarcasmatics
“Events like football matches have a proven sociological benefit – everyday, male aggression, which might otherwise emerge in more sinister forms like war and rape, can be expelled in the den of a stadium or in the cut-and-thrust of watching your favourite team on TV. ”
I know quite a few men who don’t have an interest in football and I’m pretty sure they’re not rapists.
The fact that she is trained and doing the job would indicate
that it is for her a passion. now, anyone who denies passionate
interest on the basis of societally conditioned roles is
basically denying a human being the right to develop
their unique individuality. That happens an awful lot to
girls and can be seen in girly-gangs, sisters and friends
who practice the putting-down and isolation of ‘difference’
so beautifully. One such ‘lady’ laughed off sexism on the
radio last week and yet she has absolutely no expertise
in the area, save that she’s a token pair of heels to
discuss issues of import by kow-towing to male opinion.
Animation Institute Delhi
I only saw this because of the sh*tstorm on twitter today… all I can say is… :O
I… can’t tell how serious this is… Hahahaha?