Actress Geena Davis is perhaps best remembered in the role of poor, put-upon Thelma, sidekick to Susan Sarendon’s sassy Louise, in Ridley Scott’s 1991 groundbreaking road movie, Thelma & Louise. Although still acting, Ms. Davis has increasingly turned her attention to activism for gender equality, initially in sport and laterally in the media. Interestingly her positive action in support of a more balanced reflection of society in the media sprang from fairly innocuous roots. Back in 2004 Davis was watching television with her young daughter when it struck her that there was a noticeable imbalance in the ratio of male to female characters portrayed in programmes aimed at pre-teens. Not only was there a marked numerical imbalance, it also became apparent that the roles open to female actresses fell into a narrow range of stereotypes: generally sexualised eye-candy. These were programmes directed specifically at children aged under-11, many of them – on both the big screen and the small – viewed by our children too.
Davis became convinced that this insidious form of gender bias was feeding into the reality that females are undervalued in society. “The more TV a girl watches,” Davis concluded, “the more limited she believes her opportunities will be.” This observation ultimately led to the establishment of the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and the undertaking of a comprehensive research project looking at gender in children’s entertainment at the Annenberg School for Communication of University of Southern California. This study directed by Dr. Stacy Smith and covering four hundred G, PG, PG-13, and R-Rated movie, concluded that for every one female character portrayed, there are almost three males and that girls are given far less screen time.
“The more TV a girl watches,” Davis concluded, “the more limited she believes her opportunities will be.”
The researchers also linked their findings to a resulting undermining of self-esteem amongst young girls and a consequent sexist bias amongst young boys. In response the institute developed a programme, called SEE JANE that works in collaboration with the entertainment industry using research, education and advocacy to dramatically reduce stereotyping and increase the number of female characters included in children’s entertainment.
The approach taken by Geena Davis in tackling gender equality at this fundamental level in the entertainment industry has been recognised and rewarded. In 2009 she received an honorary Doctorate from Bates College, a private liberal arts college located in Lewiston, Maine. Although tangible changes have been affected by the Institute, their task is far from complete. However, it is truly inspiring to see a woman turn an everyday observation into such a laudable and practical programme of action and to learn of a Hollywood legend using their fame to such commendable ends. After all as Geena so straightforwardly puts it, “Kids need to see entertainment where females are valued as much as males.”

well, lots of them seem to want to appear in varietes
of undress in the Sunday Papers BUT apart from the
‘mouth-shut-legs-open’ silence of women lots of writers
congregate at :
http://www.iwmf.org (including some irish) and http://www.ipwwc.org
Apparently its cool to heave on a ton of make-up , a pair of
heels , a scrap of lingerie and display the bikini-wax rather
than actually have an opinion or wish to contribute to
society- the quieter some women are, the better.
Yes indeed. The misplaced belief that this behaviour is in some way empowering and represents choice is depressing. Those links look very interesting thanks.
I’ve been having this running argument with Jordan about the Kardashions (?) and Jersey Shore. She watches them, I don’t understand it. What exactly are the Kardashions (?) famous for again? A sex tape and big butts?
I, in a turn of angst, said, ‘Jaysus Kiddo, no really, what do you like about this crap exactly?’
‘I dunno. They’re funny.’
This makes me feel oddly down in the dumps.
Yeah, the girls who appear on MTV reality shows are really depressing, because even when they’re the supposedly likeable stars (like on The Hills), they’re still completely vacuous and have no interests apart from looking good (in an ultra-bland airbrushed Californian way, of course) and going out with idiot boys.
I don’t get ‘The Hills’ either. I mean it’s scripted reality?
@eleanor
I joined IWMF in 2006. In 2010 I registered my bloggie with them.
I believe that a few journos (at least one) from Irish Times
is a member cos I see her name on petitions etcetera.
Its a place where issues and tutorials take place for new media. I joined while researching Politkovskaya.
its the one place where her legacy is respected , apart from
Novaya Gazeta , as a working woman and a journalist
Very interesting. Having been married to an actress for twenty years I am familiar with her lifetime experience: worthwhile parts for women in classical literature, television and film have been rare. Of course there are many exceptions and the situation has eased somewhat in recent years: but it remains true.
It would have been correct in the past to recognise that most directors, producers and authors were men. (And the vast majority gay with complex thoughts about women).However, anyone seeking to get a book published now is almost certain to experience a plethora of female editors. Perhaps the pendulum has swung to another extreme in the publishing world. There is hope. Good film and TV centering upon women is popular. This being so we should get more of it.
Very interesting to get that perspective from someone in the trade. I agree that the audience appetite is there alright. Characters like DI Jane Tennyson are hugely popular and deliver ratings. Female pathologists like the character in Morse/Lewis reflect our reality here in Ireland. Yet these are the exceptions – Even in the recent brilliant adaptation of Sherlock the women were housekeepers or victims. To his credit ACD created the feisty & admirable Irene Adler 120 years ago so where is she?
I’d say the majority of book editors have been women for more than just the last two decades. Even going back to the fifties and sixties, there were quite a few high-profile female editors (Diana Athill & Kaye Webb to name just two), and today I would say the vast, vast majority are female. I’m one of this ‘plethora’ of female editors (editresses? editrix?) I’ve worked in Irish publishing for the past 13 years, and in that time I’ve worked with only two male editors, and met one or two more at publishing events. Currently, all four in-house editors and all regular freelancers in my company are female. All of my friends who are published authors have female editors.
However, I don’t actually think this means the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction and that women hold all the power in publishing; a quick look at the publishing houses in Ireland and the UK shows that nearly all the publishers and MDs are men.
It may be similar in the world of fim, I don’t know.
I don’t really know what kids are watching now but I think when I was a kid there were lots more cool male characters than female. Great books like Treasure Island and The Hobbit almost seemed to forget that females existed in the world at all.
While in Enid Blyton’s mind, Georgina was “almost as good as a boy”!
I wonder will Geena have time when she sorts out Hollywood to also take on the Church – and the New Testament while shes at it. Always had a big problem with the mother of God being a virgin and the other main female character supposedly a prostitute!
When she has that done, perhaps she could help Brendan O Connor sort out the Sunday Indo Mag which I find is (photographically anyway) a lad’s mag!
Bloody hell…..
I saw a Sindo in my ma’s house a few weeks ago.
Some business-type decided to show her lingerie display
because apparently we have to know whose claws are
in who, whos is fcking whose fella on the side and
who is willing to shut her mouth rather than speak
up .
Little girls can get the message that its cool to be always
on for sex with crotchety old pervs; but don’t let on you’re
educated.
Or if you are, the Degree/MA/PHD is an interesting sideline
in what is a world dominated by the absolute necessity
to be a rambling airhead.
I don’t want to see someone’s knicker-display , so I won’t buy papers that insist its of the first importance- why bother ?
Television shows have way more complex, three-dimensional female characters than film does. I think this is because TV shows have to have more longevity – up to 24 shows in a season and up to maybe 10 seasons. With films it’s easier for the writers to get away with speaking parts for twenty men and a token woman, they can just about manage to stretch that to 90 mins. In TV that just wouldn’t work.
Television shows have way more complex, three-dimensional female characters than film does. I think this is because TV shows have to have more longevity – up to 24 shows in a season and up to maybe 10 seasons. With films it’s easier for the writers to get away with speaking parts for twenty men and a token woman, they can just about manage to stretch that to 90 mins. In TV that just wouldn’t work.
sounds like the Dáil !!!!
@Helen, women aren’t doing badly in senior management in the UK publishing industry, both HarperCollins UK & Random House UK (two of the largest conglomoretes) are run by women, Victoria Barnsley and Gail Rebuck.
Hachette, which is run by a man, nonetheless has women in senior positions, notably Jane Morpeth at Headline and Ursula Mackenzie at Little, Brown.
Ireland there is less obvious presence but Jean Harrington at Maverick, Clodagh Feehan at Mercier and Chenile Keogh at Merlin (the bad news about that imprint’s future aside) all hold leadership roles and that’s just off the top of my head.
Perhaps those numbers could be higher (I’m sure they could in fact), but I think it’s hard to argue that significant progress has not been made in publishing.
All the best,
Eoin
@Eoin Purcell
Hi Eoin!
Yes, and Maura Hyland is Director of Publications at Veritas to mention another female head … You’re right, there are women in senior positions / leadership roles in just about every Irish publishing company.
I was just replying to @charliechops1′s suggestion that the number of female editors he’d encountered meant that ‘the pendulum had swung to the other extreme’, with it’s implication that publishing had become some sort of gynocracy!
[...] “The more TV a girl watches, the more limited she believes her opportunities will be.” says Geena Davis. via Anti-room. [...]