Summer 1995 and London was fast draining of charm. In my last year at Middlesex University, a young psycho was sauntering about North London slashing women’s throats. Anthony Peter Roach, age 24, from Hornsey, had stabbed a woman to death as she walked home from Turnpike Lane Tube station. Hours later he attempted to murder a woman a couple of miles away and over the weeks before he was caught, there’d been several attempted attacks on students. We were advised to go nowhere alone. I’d just moved from Stamford Hill back to Tottenham, the same week a woman was abducted in broad daylight from a bus-stop near Seven Sisters and gangraped for six hours, as they drove around taking turns. No-one at the bus stop rang for help, even though the woman was kicking and screaming as the 4-man gang dragged her by the hair and sped off. Newspaper reports later said the people at the bus-stop assumed the woman must’ve known the men…that it seemed like a bit of a ‘game’. After seven years in London, I packed up and left.
Back in Dublin there an was air of what I can only describe as immaculateness. At least that’s how it seemed to me during the first few months. Students linking each other through the archway at Trinity College eating apples, jugglers and quirky musicians on Grafton Street, market stall women bellowing their wares on Moore Street, a welly of new cafes splattered in colourful art with latte machines fizzling away. I took in the turrety architecture all over town in a way I’d clear forgotten to do before. I visited museums, took up a language class, went on a a guided tour of the State Apartments and Viking ruins of Dublin Castle for a snitch at £1.75 (Irish pounds). The place was thriving and I was home! Four months later that feeling of inviolability vanished when 21-year-old JoJo Dullard was plucked from the streets of Moone in Kildare, never to be seen alive again. She was abducted, abused, murdered, buried, silenced: both her family and Gardaí believe so.
I obsessed about JoJo’s terribly sad tale from the off. Dublin was so expensive and she’d dropped out of her beautician’s course to take up a job in a pub back home in Callan, Co. Kilkenny. I remember reading that her sister Mary was ‘delighted’ with the decision as she’d always worried sick about her in the mean grip of the unpredictable capital. The awful crawly coincidence of ordering that last drink in Bruxelles (a pub I drank in with my mates) and missing the bus home. Hitching on roads that perhaps we all hitched along in the 1980s/90s at some stage (I know I did, and often late at night too, coming back from parties in Kildare or as far away as Galway). JoJo was used to hitching in this manner: most rural teenagers and young adults were. But it was late, she was in a hurry, probably terribly panicked about just getting home. She’d travelled to Dublin that day to pick up her last dole payment and sign off for good. According to her family, she wasn’t even going to bother. That small detail really got me.
I later wrote a short story about that dark cold November night, trying to imagine the moment when JoJo ’knew’ something was wrong. I described the landscape as ‘….dark countryside, potted with grubby fields and grimy ditches, mucky mountains that would hardly be classed as mountains compared to the Jura or the Pyrenees. Lonely out-of-the-way places good for trapping animals and smashing up stones.’ I thought of all the missing women who had been struck down in their prime ‘with lump hammers, with plastic bags over their heads, with hard shattering punches, choked by the grasping hands of mad men’. That the moments in which the missing women met their deaths were really and truly the stuff of every woman’s harshest nightmare. And I thought of JoJo, spotting something peculiar in his car, the awful foreboding when his tone may have changed, when she knew, undoubtedly, what he was going to attempt next. ‘Even in the closing seconds when your brain is fizzing, popping, fading, you know not to bother making sense of it,’ I wrote in my short story. But in reality it’s completely impossible to imagine and only the sick can ever really get there.
Larry Murphy walked free from Arbour Hill Prison early today, whizzing off into the dawn in a dark grey taxi. Some reckon he’ll stay in Dublin, others say he might head over to the UK soon. His brother Thomas was on radio earlier saying he should never have been released. Either way he wasn’t letting Gardaí know of his plans and he also refused a flat on Dublin’s Northside, where police could’ve kept him under careful surveillance. I mention him here because he’s been previously considered a prime suspect in the case of JoJo’s disappearance and in Annie McCarrick’s and Deirdre Jacob. He’s never assisted police with their enquiries in this matter and neither has he ever been charged in relation to the three missing women. A Garda I once interviewed said it was utterly chilling how he’d simply smirk and stay quiet, when asked about them. He also refused therapy, resisted any remorse for the brutal rape and attempted murder of a Carlow business woman in 2000 (which landed him in jail). The only comment he ever made about her was: “She’s alive, isn’t she?” Much of his time was spent in prison carving wooden toys for the children of staff and various charities. He even made a podium for the Special Olympics, by all accounts: a model prisoner.
Despite the medieval braying from the tabloid press that he’ll strike again and soon, I personally don’t believe for a nanosecond that Larry Murphy is going to put a foot wrong for a very long time. He can wait. He can play with the authorities and the public. Memories will sustain him. This day is a very special one for him after all. Even just the God of small things: he hasn’t seen any of our modern capital’s hallmarks for a start: the Luas, the spire, etc. There’s a lot to take in. Especially the reams of happy young women pacing along the city streets, tired women too, stomping home from work. Women who will have no idea who he is or what he’s done. It’s been an age since he was able to glance sideways at strangers, with every ounce of his civil rights protected. The fact remains that there are dozens of Larry Murphys out there, a lot of whom we’ve handily forgotten. The likes of Paddy O Driscoll from Fermoy in Cork, released from prison in 2004 after serving a sentence for raping a young mother: six months later he bludgeoned another woman over the head with a brick, knocked her unconscious and raped her for over an hour. There are literally too many of these incurable psychopathic rapist and murderer types to recount here, in one blog. For the time being the public is concentrating on Larry and the obscenely Draconian laws that allow for an affirmed ’critically dangerous’ person to roam our streets with freedom honoured and upheld and intact.
By contrast the families of the missing women have felt very unsupported; not just with the formal investigsations but also with funding and resources. I wrote an aritcle in the middle of the boom about the Missing Persons’ Helpline being shut down due to ‘lack of funds’ (31st March 2005). On the same day it was reported in the media that ‘one million euro mortgages’ in the nation’s capital were the new-fangled norm. While the property pages boasted that the boom was bigger and better and louder than ever, families of Ireland’s disappeared slumped back in bankrupt silence.
I think too of JoJo’s family today, and the families of all the other missing women, trying very hard to avoid the horrible hype of Larry’s freedom. It’s a daily grind for these people just to forget. And of course without any bodies or DNA evidence, there is little or no hope of the missing women cases ever being solved. There’s scant hope too because Garda searches for these women in almost all cases were hideously delayed during the first few crucial days. Some of the families would later travel unaided to America to ask for help from the FBI because they felt so ignored by the Irish authorities. In Jo Jo’s case it was even suggested to her family that she may have got the boat clear out of Ireland altogether of her own accord due to ‘personal problems’. You can read the individual stories in a Sunday World book here:
There’s a photo of JoJo that always sticks out in my mind, back in the 1980s, sitting in her bedroom smiling away, a WHAM poster carefully sellotaped to the wall. An ordinary teenage girl on the brink of everything. Back in the day when the Irish countryside in which she lived was wild and uncultivated, when young men like Larry were out hunting for animals to tear up alive. Long before the ambush of boutique-style hotels took over or the reality sunk in of how utterly easy it is to murder, bury, and get away with it.
June Caldwell is a writer, who after 13 years of journalism, is finally writing a novel. She has a MA in Creative Writing and was winner of ‘Best Blog Post’ award at the 2011 Irish Blog Awards. You can read this post on her own blog here:



Excellently written, June.
thanks for sharing this June – very well written and an excellent piece to remind us all how devastating violence – esp against women- is and how little society seems to do in response to its perpetrators. it’s so important not to forget these women and their families nor to continue accepting the awfully inadequate ways our society responds to this violence and its treatment of women in general.
Brilliant, poignant, and sad.
One wonders what it is about the Irish government, or the party that has dominated it for years, that the only legislation they can reasonably prioritize is that to do with finance. They did manage to be swayed by public opinion once ‘people’ started burning out head shops, but otherwise they just seem to muddle along. There is so much ancient creaking legislation that turns into real, glaring, ugly problems such as this — but it’s easier to write one page legislation protecting foxes.
What gets me about this is that the press has descended into
sensationalism and very few media outlets are talking about
VAW (legislations and criminal law).
Media attention is (imo) wholly and exclusively honed in on the man
and not on remedies. I did not hear Dermot Ahern TD at all, as Minister
For Justice and Equality do anything positive regarding confronting
issues of violence, its bleeeding haywire.
Am pasting in here the new UN Women website and hoping that
someday we will get media-maturity in discussing issues of
violence and their criminal law remedies- most espeically
sexual violences against women and girls. Currently the RCCs
are over-burdened and have little enough funding and support.
= Why is the media not discussing the issue of Rape nor has
COSC come up ?
http://www.unwomen.org/
A thought-provoking and beautifully written post, as always, from you.
One small thing you might want to check (for libel reasons)
Are you sure about this?
“He is a chief ‘suspect’ in the case of Jo Jo’s disappearance and in Annie McCarrick’s and Deirdre Jacob.”
My understanding is that he was a chief suspect but they have found no evidence linking him to any of those murders. I think that means he’s officially off the chief suspect list.
Yeah, he’s been called a chief suspect a number of times (or ‘prime suspect’ as in this Trib article headline last week: http://www.tribune.ie/article/2010/jul/04/prime-suspect-no-bodies-no-case/) but I get ye, in the ‘past’, have changed that sentence slightly! Imagine being sued by him!? Just watched some coverage of his prison exit on TV3 there. He stopped at Coolock Garda Station to make a complaint about harassment. Always ultra aware of their human rights, these monsters, while stripping victims of theirs.
Excellent piece and so sad. I often think of that poor JoJo Dollard. We used to pass through Moone on way to Dublin (pre motorway days) and the phone box where she was reportedly last seen was on side of road. It always struck me that she was so vulnerable – but really it could have been anyone. Today I was thinking of her again, and if I, a complete stranger feels sad, how must her family feel every day …
Excellent writing, well done and keep it up.
Thanks so much Alan!
Thanks for all the comments folks. It’s very hard to say anything at all that hasn’t been said already. I was thinking of the missing women all day (yes yes, we know he wasn’t charged for that…but there’s a lot of ‘circumstantial evidence’ bobbing around in the boat in the harbour). I agree with Christine that the media is foxhunting his release, it’s a dynamic news story and I imagine the hunt and follow is going to continue for some time, but the real issues are not being dealt with.
Tim makes a very good point above too that the government are lazy shitbags and don’t make changes without intense lobbying first. I am not saying that Murphy’s ‘human rights’ shouldn’t be protected but so should wider society’s. This guy didn’t even vaguely atone, take responsibility or help police further with their enquiries. Wherever he goes, he’ll be a danger, even if he controls his impulses for a while or even years.
Marie: I thought of Jo Jo today too, the disgusting randomness of going for that last dole payment after she’d already left the ‘big smoke’ behind, the fact that these crazy incidents are always so arbitrary and opportunistic. We’ve all done things when we’re pissed that made no sense or were considered ‘dangerous’. I’ve a list as long as my arm. Feel so sad for her family today. The endless not knowing; ultimately a much bigger prison sentence than ten years for them.
Legislation.
Given that you can’t legislate against rape, or even (attempted) murder, but only for the punishment for rape, etc., what kind of legislative change are we talking about here, exactly? Locking rapists up for life? Chemical castration? The death penalty?
Declan, I wish I had answers. I don’t. I’ve been watching the TV coverage tonight and where is this guy going to stay? As far as I can make out at least one ex-prisoner’s hostel refused him. Bear in mind too that he also refused accommodation (a flat) in North Dublin in advance of his release and didn’t want to cooperate one iota with Gardai and prison services in establishing an address where he could be monitored. Will he be sleeping rough tonight? Given that he was so unresponsive to any therapy or rehab offered to him also, it begs the question of what is good behaviour in our current prison system? He’s had 25% of his sentence automatically reduced for keeping his gob shut. That sounds more problematic than ‘good’ to me? On the larger issue, I personally don’t agree with the death penalty but I do feel that ‘chemical castration’ could be a consideration for serious sexual crime(s). We hear over and over that his type of ‘condition’ is incurable, so surely leaving it ‘unattended’ is counter productive. Also, there needs to be some system put in place for dealing with the release of prisoners deemed dangerous. Of course opinions here don’t help all that much, when we need answers.
June, thanks for this.
Best piece I’ve read in ages.
Thanks so much Megan.
Just read this. Without a doubt one of the most powerful pieces ever written on this vexed and deeply disturbing case. It should be widely published. Absolutely says it all. Amazing and gut-wrenching.
Excellent piece June. I’m still haunted by the television reconstruction of Jo-Jo’s last movements on that night she was murdered, and Deirdre Jacob too. I was always struck by the ordinariness of their circumstances – Deirdre walking home in the afternoon along a quiet stretch of country road, or Jo-Jo hitching a lift at night because she missed the bus (I’ve done it myself as a teenager). We can never see justice for these women or their families while a psychopath like LM roams free.
Amazing piece. Chilling. Tragedy for the families just left wondering
Incredible piece June.
I think on a regular basis about all these missing women and also about all the women in Ireland and elsewhere who are subjected to such cruelty from men. The rape, torture, verbal abuse etc that women have had to endure over the years cannot be emphasised enough. Our government really need to take all the comments above into consideration and change the laws regarding sex offenders in this country. Why was this man let out today and given 7 days before he has to tell the officials where he is staying? Why could he not be electronically tagged so his whereabouts are known at all times? Is it going to take another attempted murder or worse a successful murder on his part for him to finally be put away for LIFE and for the laws to be changed? Irish law needs so much to be made tougher for criminals and there should be no such thing as getting out for good behaviour in the case of sex offenders…A very well written article and I hope all sex offenders eventually end up in jail and get to do the time for their dreadful crimes/ crimes…
Excellent post…thought provoking and poignant. The thing that shocked me most was how the Irish authorities let down the families of these missing people, forcing them to seek help elsewhere. And furthermore how they even tried to dismiss the case by suggesting ‘personal problems’. If we can’t turn to the authorities to do everything in their power to support the families and get to the bottom of these cases, it doesn’t say much for our justice system. I guess this is old news, but when ordinary people, Jo-Jo, and ordinary families are affected, it brings this home to us once again.
June,
You say it’s hard to say anything that hasn’t already been said, but you’ve articulated so beautifully the terrible isolation of victims’ families, something that is only touched on briefly at the moment with all the fear surrounding the ‘present’ nature of Murphy’s threat to society as it stands now.
When I was 16 I worked in the local bar at home with a woman who was Jo Jo’s cousin and would occasionally take off up the country to help out with the post office run by Jo Jo’s (I don’t recall if it was run by the sister, Mary, of whom you have a picture there) while the family dealt with yet another fruitless lead in the case, or were travelling to solicit the help with another forensic or investigative specialist in her case.
I got the impression that over time, they knew they would not get Jo Jo back, but to know what had happened to her would somehow make it easier to bear.
There is little support for such families, and in some circles, there is an insinuation that they should ‘get over it’ after a respectable amount of time. Which is inhumane, if you consider anything about snatching a girl off the street and destroying a family forever to be something that will ever be anything less than the worst type of disrespect for humanity.
Not saying that Jo Jo’s case has anything to do with Murphy – clearly, his chilling uncooperation with any enquiries doesn’t allow for speculation, whether we like it or not.
But thank you so much for taking the time to write this piece, and for being the empathetic person that you are. It articulates everything every right-thinking person should be saying, but don’t know how to.
Susan, you’re bang on about the families continued battle and pain being lost in the ether. I heard some terribly sad stories about the lengths some of the families went to in order to root out the truth, even digging up the sides of roads and fields themselves, just so as not to give up when investigations seemed to go cold. Sarah McInerney’s book http://bit.ly/cUXPsU has some heart-rending insight into teh human aspect/aftermath of the families affected. It is unimaginable to me what they went through. So terribly sad.
Words fail me somewhat. I want to comment, to say well done for writing this post. I was going to say for writing this post about such a “terribly” “sad” “event”/”topic”…”disaster”. Events are positive, missing girls are not a topic…what is an apt word?
Tripping up already in an attempt to express the utter horror I feel when I think of all these girls; and in the 90s there was so many more than the 3 poor girls making the headlines because of Larry Murphys release. Even a beautiful girl from my own home town who was 7 months pregnant.
I think that’s why your article is such a good one. It verbalises what we don’t even want to think about…the possible last moments at the hands of such sinister people. People who turn families into tormented ghosts. I consciously stop myself thinking about the pain the families feel. It’s just too much for me.
Do the Government feel the same? Can they not face it either? Would they prefer to think happy thoughts too,and not sully their minds or upset their cosy sleep with such nightmares? Their hefty pay packets should dictate otherwise! It really is a “joke”…again words fail me.
For some reason, I can’t edit that comment but I see I left some important words out. To clarify, it was the lady I worked with – Jo Jo’s cousin – who would go up to help Jo Jo’s sister with the post office, not me.
Is there any evidence (even circumstantial) that he abused or mutilated animals? It kind of seems in this piece that you’ve lumped him into the serial killer category, and written about his intentions and fantasies and future actions based on an episode or two of Criminal Minds.
Mark, I was careful to say ‘young men LIKE Larry’, I have not said specifically him. Aside from that it is documented that Larry had a keen interest in hunting and used his knowledge of remote areas in Wicklow to hunt alone. He had a gun license from age 18. And of course we know that he also hunted women, he stalked his Carlow victim for over a month before he struck. I have made no presumptions at all about his ‘future’ actions as you put it, in fact the only comment I made about him in the future is when I said I believe he won’t put a foot wrong for a very long time. PS. I don’t watch Criminal Minds as I find it boring and formulaic, the same MOs being bandied about week after week. Real murder seems to be more messy, brutal and complicated.
Thanks again for all the comments. It’s hard to know what solutions are out there. Personally I feel the ‘good behaviour’ clause for starters is a bureacratic absurdity that could be scrapped. Serious crime should carry serious sentences. I am still confused by the maximum penalty in Ireland for rape is life imprisonment, but are we talking medieval life spans here as it’s never more than 10 or 11 years max and that’s for hideous levels of violence and premeditation (or in Larry’s case: attempted murder thrown in) as well. As Dearbhail McDonald pointed out in her Indo article: http://bit.ly/9eLdyr in the UK there are cases where preventative incarceration (internment) is used as a method of risk management of offenders considered dangerous. Do we have the resources here to even go down that route? There was the case of Edward Piortowski, a Polish man who raped a woman in front of her partner (after breaking into their house) – he also threatened to kill her, the boyfriend and the woman’s daughter. The judge told the Central Criminal Court that the man should never be released, but how does this work when the sentences are concurrent and he’s out in the same time span as Murphy? On the otherhand recidivism rates for violent rapists are high so is post-prison management the way to go, electronic tagging for instance or is this just a defensive response with its own limitations? I don’t know. We used to lock women away in institutions for life (real life terms at that) for simply having children out of wedlock, when we were twice as ‘broke’ as we are now and no-one seemed to bat an eyelid. Last year’s stats revealed that out of 578 sex offenders offered rehab/therapy last year in Ireland, only 7% agreed, probably because taking part in a rehab programme would mean facing up the impact of the crime. And what serious violent rapist wants to bother doing that?
Fantastic piece.
Another excellent piece June – well done.
Here’s a legislative change: anyone who has served time for violent crimes, should they be caught again for the slightest assault, should be automatically locked up for the rest of their natural. Simply because they’ve proven themselves incapable of “reform”.
Oh, and a very moving piece, BTW!
Really well written piece. On a slightly separate point, I wonder how healthy all the emphasis being placed on Murphy in general is throughout the press.
In the past week several newspapers have been referring to Murphy as a person who strikes fear into the heart of all Irish women, and that the day of his release was the day that all women feared for a decade and all this kind of nonsense. Considering that women who are raped, attacked or murdered are far more likely to face those crimes at the hands of their partners than a stranger, relentlessly putting Murphy on the front page of papers makes him seem like the only rapist in the land.
I understand why people would question his early release and the fact that he was allowed refuse treatment to counselling in prison (surely that should be mandatory in this case) but I think energy would be better focussed in questioning the lack of conviction in rape cases in Ireland – of which we have the poorest record in Europe – and not continuing this obsession with Murphy.
Una, your point is absolutely valid and if more emphasis was put on the appalling conviction rate for rape in Ireland – the lowest in Europe – then the media would be doing the cause of women and children a greater service. Where is the attention and energy in the Dail and Senate over trying to improve conviction rates? Why is there not a level of outrage at the highest echelons over this damning record?
Thanks for a very thought-provoking piece.
You mention in the comments that chemical castration may be a useful option. Unfortunately, this has been found to be largely ineffective in sex offender treatment. Rape and sexual abuse are rarely (if ever) primarily driven by a desire for sexual gratification. Offenders want to dominate/humiliate their victim, this drive is not removed through chemical castration, it simply requires a different form of abuse.
It often seems entirely approppriate that people who commit these sorts of offences should be referred to as ‘monsters’ or ‘‘incurable’ psychopathic’ types, but I’m not sure that this is beneficial to anyone. To present to women the idea of predatorial monsters wandering the streets, is to present a world that seems cripplingly terrifying. Also, it’s the individual’s thought processes and experiences that drive them to commit such hideous offenses. The best possible route to preventing recidivism (of any kind) is to acknowledge these thought processes. The offender needs to acknowledge the reasons behind their behaviour and take appropriate steps to adapt their thought processes (and some offenders then choose voluntary chemical castration as a sign of their commitment to these cognitive adaptations, rather than as a cure for their offending). Certainly, it seems that those who refuse treatment are making a statement regarding their feelings towards the seriousness of their crime, and for this reason, progress in treatment should be central to any release plans. Irish law rarely touches on the psychology of criminal behaviour, yet the psychology of the individual criminal is central to any crimes committed. Certainly, Larry Murphy’s behaviour was monstrous, and the enduring pain felt by his victim and the families of any missing women is monstrous; but by labelling people as monsters we are in danger of creating a situation where they don’t have to take responsibility for their crimes and they don’t have to change.
Cat, all valid points but what about those offenders like Murphy who choose not to go through rehab programmes? Perhaps women should be pressurising the political class to bring in legislation which would stipulate that your sentence is longer, you’re kept in prison for more years, if you refuse rehab and counselling to deal with, and take responsibility for, the crime. Surely that would be realisable in law?
June, I would go a step further and suggest that not only should rehab programmes be mandatory, but release plans should be more strongly influenced by the progress made in treatment. Signing up for treatment is a relatively easy thing to do, but engaging actively is another. As a psychologist, I am (no doubt) biased, but I do think that a greater amount of attention should be paid to those who work directly with offenders.
[...] Summer 1995 and London was fast draining of charm. In my last year at Middlesex Uni, a young psycho was sauntering about North London slashing women’s throats. Anthony Peter Roach, age 24, from Hornsey, had stabbed a woman to death as she walked home from Turnpike Lane Tube station. Hours later he attempted to murder a woman a couple of miles away and over the weeks before he was caught, there’d been several attempted attacks on students. We were … Read More [...]
PS: IMO the suggestion that chemical castration would be a viable option to treat, punish or address the issue of supposedly incurable sex offenders really is an outrageous one.
Is what way? Is it outrageous from a human rights viewpoint or simply because you don’t think it would work?
Great to see so many comments on this.
Just to let you know that June is not ignoring you all, she’s away until tomorrow and will no doubt respond when she’s back.
Cat,
You say:
“You mention in the comments that chemical castration may be a useful option. Unfortunately, this has been found to be largely ineffective in sex offender treatment. Rape and sexual abuse are rarely (if ever) primarily driven by a desire for sexual gratification. Offenders want to dominate/humiliate their victim, this drive is not removed through chemical castration, it simply requires a different form of abuse. ”
Some (admittedly shallow) research on google threw up this http://jaapl.org/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/16 which suggests to me that castration does lower reoffense rates, and where it doesn’t might be due to the effectiveness of the castration on sexual desire, and nothing to do with the realtion fo sexual desire to rape.
June’s piece very sensitively focused on the victims of violence, so I don’t want to switch the focus too much; but I do feel that I should comment on that link, Mark. It centres on surgical rather than chemical castration, which hasn’t been commonly practiced in Western Europe or North America for a long time.
It also focuses on voluntary castration. As I mentioned in my original comment, some offenders choose voluntary castration to demonstrate a commitment to their willingness to change, following therapy. It’s not so surprising that someone who would take a radical step like surgical castration would be less likely to offend – they’re showing a very extreme example of their commitment to change. The question is, why do these people attempt to change, while others don’t?
The article discusses some offenders who initially refused castration but later agreed, in order to gain early release. These offenders re-offended. To me, this suggests that castration may be personally beneficial to the individual who has decided to actively change, but castration without any cognitive shift is limited in its benefits to anyone. What I was trying (but failing) to highlight in my earlier comment, was the futility of enforcing any form of forced-castration, as simply changing an individual’s biology won’t change the way that they view themselves or the way that they interact with and treat others.
Also, long term use of Depo-Provera (the most commonly used antilibinal drug) can have serious health effects, so even if it was thought to be a ‘cure,’ its long-term prescription would be a legal nightmare
My response was not in support of chemical castration. It was to question the notion that it can’t work due to a belief (which I disagree with) that sexual desire is not a major component in rape.
If surgical castration candidates were displaying a commitment to change, and the surgery and resulting effect on sexual desire was not a factor in their lower reoffense rates, then the procedure would not be needed at all. But then there must be situations where people would be willing to undergo castration but for whatever reason it is not given to them. These men should have a similar low reoffense rate, and if this were the case, I think it would show up fairly quickly.
From what I’ve read, the effects of chemical castration can be offset with testosterone ingestion, and this would somewhat negate the effects of their castration.
For these reasons I don’t think you can claim that castration cannot be successful due to sexual desire not being a major component in rape.
Beautifully written June,
I’d like to say, that while we remember the missing woman, and hope that one day their families do get the answers they should have and must have. The release of Larry Murphy brings this to the forefront again. I would like to remind people that he was not jailed for being the main suspect in their disapperance but he was jailed for only 10.5 years of a 15 year sentence for the sadistic, brutal rape and attempted murder of a girl that thankfully survived this attack. This girl (or woman now) was not just a business woman from carlow that should be lightly scimmed over as she has been in all media coverage in the last few days and when ever this animals name is mentioned. She is someones daughter, sister maybe even a wife and mother by now. So may we all reflect on who the real victim was here and think of what hell this day has bought her. The legal system today failed her and let her down,and while the rest of us fear he will move into our town,I would hate to think what fear she may have today.
Terrific piece June, thought provoking and moving.
*applauds*
Great piece June, very moving. Agree that it should be published somewhere.
Thanks again for all the comments Arelene, Lauren, Una, Catherine, Mark, Whocares, etc. Apologies for the delay in answering, I’m away at the mo. Debate is always good! It is such a complex issue especially when the person has served his time and so on. The media mob mentality doesn’t help but is predictable all the same. I heard a tabloid mate the other day exclaim: “Exciting times, we’re going to hunt down Murphy!” as if he was on his way to a paintball challenge. Hopefully the coverage however will raise much more deeper issues about the treatment of women and children in this still-misogynistic society.
Terrific article. The media coverage of this has really disturbed me. It has left no room for the actual victim of the crime he was prosecuted for. TV3s coverage being most disturbing I think!
Yeah TV3 went a bit gung-ho. Bizarrely, it has calmed totally in just a matter of days. What does that say about how ‘reactive’ we are?
[...] (more because it is a beautifully written piece of work) June Caldwell of The Anti-Room on the ‘still missing’ women post-Larry Murphy’s release. Despite the medieval braying from the tabloid press that he’ll [...]
Surely a convicted psychopath is by definition criminally insane?
The nature of the crime + the absence of remorse + the considered opinion of qualified psychiatrists should be enough to determine indefinite incarceration of the criminally insane until they pose no threat to others.
Unfortunately he wasn’t sent down for being a ‘psychopath’. If it were that easy… He did his time for brutal premeditated violent rape + attempted murder. Our legal system is shakey, sentences don’t make a whole lot of sense and auto-remission is served up luke-warm on a plate even to those who frown on rehab or counselling. Seems nuts to me for both the person coming out and society taking it in.
Great piece, beautifully written.
Thanks Siobhan, was genuinely surprised at the feedback.
Thought to add the ongoing O Toole thing in here :
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2010/0817/1224276972498.html
I may have commented on it a few times. There is a
fundamental dishonesty in approach evident , so
thought to point that out.
Christine, I liked one line in that article: ‘The panic about the idea of rapists living among us masks the uncomfortable reality that they already do’… The rest slightly smelled of broadsheet smug.
“Christine, I liked one line in that article: ‘The panic about the idea of rapists living among us masks the uncomfortable reality that they already do’… The rest slightly smelled of broadsheet smug.”
Hi June,
I agree with you about the article, The comments I made were to do
with media treatment of the subject, I referred to the 2006 Emergency
Laws for Sexual offences. Here being a prime example of how people tub-thumped us into a set of laws that require a constitutional Referendum and how in reviewing the legislation the then minister succeeded in putting the rape victim back on the
stand to describe their clothing. The laws achieved absolutely nothing
for victims of rape.
I went to that debate on behalf of a friend who was sexually abused
and sat watching as not one woman TD/Minister spoke on the
issue from a female POV. Not one.
This is the crux of the problem- the only woman’s voice evident was
a letter pointing out the problems by the Ombudsman for Children
and it was ultimately ignored. The proposed Referendum is now set back
until 2011 and we still have flawed legislation on the statute.
How can laws re sexual offences reflect anything but the politics
of a male-dominated system that has blind-spots and a lack
of honesty when it comes to tending the constitutional and rights issues.
Thank you for providing a perspective on media, I agree with you.
It has evaded, avoided and fed hysteria but not discussed the
issues cos they consider us thick and unable to understand
the workings of our laws.
The debates are June 1st-2nd 2006. Criminal law (sexual offences) Bill
2006/7
I don’t know about the laws in Ireland but here in America all sex offenders are required by law in all states to register with the local police departments and their addresses are mailed out to all residents in the area that they live in along with the charges for which they served time. I have received two such mailings in the past 6 months so I know where and who they are within my immediate area. Having young grandchildren (teenagers) who visit regularly, I am relieved to be notified of these offenders so I may take reasonable precautions. That is the kind of regulation that your country needs to implement for the protection of innocent people with these predators walking around freely. I don’t feel that it is a violation of any of their rights since they lose those when convicted of a felony here in the states. You have to be a contributing upright citizen in order to maintain your rights and committing a violent crime against another person whether man or woman violates those rights to freedom and protection.
Hi V., thanks for commenting. Alas America are way ahead of us in this regard. We have a sex offender’s register here since 2001 and while perpetrators of these crimes are obliged to let the authorities know of their whereabouts (address, etc.) these details are not passed on to the community – I guess for fear of vigilantism, etc. – but this lack of transparency causes a lot of residual fear. The tabloid press treat it like a cat-and-mouse hunt. In Larry’s case it meant that he could ‘rest’ nowhere on release….everywhere he went he was pursued and hounded. The public were seemingly more angry because he had shown no remorse and had refused psychological help/rehabilitation in prison. Through media pressure he was forced to seek the help of the probation services after being ‘shocked’ at the public reaction. I’ve heard he has since been in the UK and France though no-one can ever be sure. Many believe that it’s not our business to know, that he’s served his time and should now be afforded all the same human rights as any other Irish citizen. More info on how it all pans out in Ireland is available here: http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/justice/law_enforcement/monitoring-sex-offenders-in-ireland
[...] post originally appeared on the Anti Room blog from August 12th, 2010. To read comments click here GA_googleAddAttr(“AdOpt”, “1″); GA_googleAddAttr(“Origin”, “other”); [...]